Snap2objects invites to

snap2objects

DesignTips+Freebies+Inspiration

snap2objects header image 2

How Can Webdesigners On Linux Survive Without Adobe?

November 26th, 2007 by Robert

header_linux_webdesigner.jpg
Image Credit: Oliver Saraja

We all heard about Linux OS. There are a lot of myths about it, not very many people are using it (all Linux freaks won’t agree with me on this - but let’s face the truth - the Linux users are niche community). In this short article I would like to show you what’s Linux is all about, and moreover - is it a good tool for webdesiger?

If you’re familiar with Linux you can stop reading now - since I won’t discover anything new for you ;).

First thing - Linux comes in distribiutions - and each “distro” can be very different from the other. All my experience with Linux comes from Ubuntu - I belive it’s the easiest and the simplest operating system I’ve seen (well - maybe Mac’s OSX is a litter easier to use and look nicer - but Ubuntu isn’t far behind).

So - let’s see how good is Ubuntu for webdesigners.

Pros

1. The most obvious and probably the biggest advantage is that Ubuntu (all all other software mentioned here) is FREE. It means you can legally use it without paying a penny. And you’ll have all future updates for free as well. If you look at some prices of Windows software for designers (and Windows itself) and multiply it by couple of workstation (like in our office) - you can really save A LOT of money.

2. Ubuntu is secure. You don’t have to worry about viruses, trojans, dialers, hackers and other nasty traps that awaits in the internet. Pure pleasure - you can focus on work without being distracted by virus scanner popups or you don’t have to worry about somebody stealing your data.

3. Ubuntu is also very easy to configure (there’s a myth that Linux is hard to configure and used only by tech geeks - that totally untrue. Ubuntu is much easier than Windows). And there’s huge community of users that will help you when you’ll be in trouble.

4. Visual design. It’s important that your workspace would inspire you and boost creativity. While using Ubuntu you can forget about clumsy, ugly Windows buttons&fonts. Interface is very appealing - and beside that you can turn on some cool 3d effects.

Cons

1. There’re no Adobe software for Linux. You have some other open source solutions that has more or less the same features - but there are slight differences in interface, work process or capabilities. The most important question is if you’re ready to accept those differences and get used to new software. Let’s take a closer look what Ubuntu can offer

Software for Webdesigners

Conclusion

I think that it’s worth trying to do your webdesign on Ubuntu. You can save a lot of money by making your work easier.You can always go back to old Windows (or mac off course), and besides - the word “creativity” doesn’t mean “I owe Photoshop”.

About the author
I am Robert Podgorski and I run a small webdesign studio BlackMoon Development. Apart from being “the Boss” I’m also a webdesigner, flash developer and cartoonist.

Popularity: 4% [?]

Add to Technorati Favorites | Subscribe by RSS feed or by Email

Tags:   · 24 Comments

Leave A Comment

24 responses so far ↓

  • 1 M4rc0 Nov 26, 2007 at 8:30 am

    I use linux (fedora) and i do some webdesign and i really miss photoshop sometimes. GIMP is powerfull, but needs a bit of learning

    But you know whats worse?
    Dreamweaver. Theres no program like that, all the others are quite weak, and i’ve tried quite a lof of them (BlueFish so far is my fav, but still very weak for html due some bugs). I think the solution will be wine with Dreamweaver until Adobe doesn’t release for Linux distros.

    When Adobe do that, expect a massive new linux lovers :)

    And you mention UBUNTU like the linux, its not what “ubuntu” has to offer, but what “linux” has to offer

    I expected a bit more of information, but maybe is usefull for those who doesn’t know much about linux.

    Nice Site!

  • 2 Robert Nov 26, 2007 at 10:31 am

    @Marco
    check the first paragraph:
    “If you’re familiar with Linux you can stop reading now - since I won’t discover anything new for you ;)”
    As for GIMP - sure it’s need learning (as anything else).
    True that BlueFish is not good enough - try Quanta Plus - it’s very, very close to Dreamweaver.
    I know it’s more about what “linux” can offer - but this post was aimed at people who never ever hear about linux or free software - and I think that Ubuntu is the best for start (Fedora is also very nice and smooth). Cheers

  • 3 M4rc0 Nov 26, 2007 at 11:55 am

    I tried QUANTA too and i didn’t like

    Actually i’m not fan of KDE apps because it installs lots of stuff with it

    I suggest you to try Kompozer. I think you’ll like that one.

    Like i said, lets wait for Adobe until then as they have plans for linux :)

    And i’m brazilian, nice to know you live in the city i borned =D

    I’ll stay tuned on this site. Cheers.

  • 4 M4rc0 Nov 26, 2007 at 12:08 pm

    “And i’m brazilian, nice to know you live in the city i borned =D

    I’ll stay tuned on this site. Cheers.”

    Sorry for the double-post, but that was for Mauricio.

  • 5 mao Nov 27, 2007 at 1:36 am

    Hi Marco :) Curitiba is a great city I love it here so modern, clean and organized.

  • 6 gri3fon Nov 27, 2007 at 2:44 am

    yeah, maybe linux doesn’t have dreamweaver.
    but if your editing/writing for tableless layout, text editor firefox + firebug or chris pederik plugin is enough… but if it table (nested), i need those F6.

    as for vector, you could also try xara xtreme..

    and nice site.

  • 7 Christian Nov 27, 2007 at 5:53 am

    The thing is, that gimp isnt that useable and powerfull as photoshop. And why should i just throw away my software licenses just for using ubuntu or others distros?

    I like ubuntu and i use it as an alternativ os on my laptop, but without photoshop it simply doesnt fit my needs. Gimp is ok, but you will never find this amount of brushes, shapes, tutorials and such stuff as for photoshop!

    If GIMP would be so great like photoshop, why everybody buy licences from adobe if they could have a better one for free?

  • 8 Robert Nov 27, 2007 at 6:08 am

    @Christian
    a) you can use PS brushes in GIMP (http://www.gimptalk.com/forum/topic/tutorial-How-To-Convert-Photoshop-Brushes-4349-1.html)
    b) you can use PS tutorials in GIMP (most of the effects/filters are pretty much the same)
    c) If you have already a licence for PS and you know it very well - I agree that switching to GIMP is useless. But many people can’t afford PS licence - and I think going for GIMP is far better than using any warezed PS.
    Cheers

  • [...] provoked a little discussion about the subject - you can check it here. If you liked that post, then try these…About us by admin on September 24th, 2007Contact us by [...]

  • 10 Max Nov 28, 2007 at 12:40 am

    I’m php developer. Development in any Linux is more user friendly than in windows cuz any distro of linux has apache + php. I’m using VIM to code. Quanta is also powerfull tool, also Eclipse with PHP IDE. GIMP don’t have effects like a Photoshop in evry version developers inplements more and more features witch are similar to Photoshop. Photoshop has plenty of patents. And it could stop the Gimp developers to introduce the patent protected features. Many plugins in Gimp can make similar effects like drop shadow or gradient overlay but after resize the layer witch has the effect you must re-render it cuz the effect is in another layer. It’s long way for gimp to catch up photoshop. But in gimp layout of the page can have same “wow effect” like in photoshop but the way of design may be bit longer in Gimp.

  • 11 Chocolim Nov 28, 2007 at 11:59 am

    I didnt find a replace for dreamweaver on linux, Quanta does not have a good support for css and layers, in fact between kate or gedit and quanta there isnt much diference

  • 12 Wojciech Halicki-Piszko Nov 28, 2007 at 3:21 pm

    I’d like to know how can webdesigner live without IE rendering preview - I don’t think Adobe software is THAT important for me. I can do a lot of it can do with free or other commercial (Corel, MS Expression or whatever worth part of your salary), but how can I see how my page looks in IE without much trouble?

  • 13 Tyson Nov 28, 2007 at 10:14 pm

    Wojciech Halicki-Piszko,

    What a great question you pose…. As luck would have it, I found just the answer…

    http://browsershots.org/

    Pretty cool, eh?

  • 14 Robert Nov 29, 2007 at 12:49 am

    You can also try to launch IE via Wine (running smooth) - or this solution - http://www.tatanka.com.br/ies4linux/page/Installation. The fact is that all the devs round here run both IE 6 and 7 on Linux.

  • 15 Lars Pohlmann Nov 29, 2007 at 1:16 am

    I believe the lack of a working Internet Explorer on Linux is the main road-block for doing webdesign on Linux. I don’t like IE, but as a matter of fact it still has the largest userbase (and especially IE6 behaves in many cases a lot different than gecko-based browsers)

    @Robert: I tried IE via Wine once. It renders the pages (especially the fonts) different than on Windows. It also crashes on certain Javascripts that wouldn’t crash on Windows.

    So you can’t use this as reference.

    @Tyson: Nice tool. Still wouldn’t suffice, when your working on sites with login, or intranet-sites. Let alone “real-time testing” or javascript-debugging.

  • 16 Robert Nov 29, 2007 at 1:39 am

    @Lars - try IEs4Linux (http://www.tatanka.com.br/ies4linux/page/Installation). Cheers

  • 17 Lars Pohlmann Nov 29, 2007 at 1:51 am

    @Robert: I did.

  • 18 Lars Pohlmann Nov 29, 2007 at 1:54 am

    And another thing for IE on wine. To be perfectly legal you’d still need a windows license…

  • 19 Robert Nov 29, 2007 at 2:15 am

    Yes - you need Windows licence anyway - even when using IE on wine. It’s strange you have problems with IEs4Linux - it’s working quite well for us. The other option is to have a second computer with Windows - just to test sites on IE (and play games;). Cheers.

  • 20 Oscar Merida Nov 29, 2007 at 8:42 am

    I still hold out hope that eventually web designers will design in the raw material of the web - HTML + CSS

  • 21 The Answer Nov 29, 2007 at 7:49 pm

    The whole Linux and open source religion is like the DOS and Windows thing revisited. Some people thought they deserved some kind of trophy because they were able to do anything from a command prompt. If you’re one of those people, hey, good for you, but I’m busy getting real work done.

  • 22 Lars Pohlmann Nov 30, 2007 at 12:41 am

    Please don’t feed the troll.

  • 23 Edwin Nov 30, 2007 at 10:00 am

    In our particular case, we have a stand alone PC we use for windows testing; as some people has mentioned, testing IE on Linux is not always effective. I understand that not everybody can have a PC for testing purposes only, particularly independent freelancers, but at today prices, I think it shouldn’t be that expensive chip in a few hundreds to have a small PC computer. You don’t even need to have a monitor, you can access it with VNC, as we do, and obviously it doesn’t have direct internet connection to avoid viruz/trojanz/dialerz/warez/appz and everything ending with a z…

  • 24 ghostshadow Dec 11, 2007 at 2:42 am

    I know this was posted in November, but there is a new Ubuntu project called : Ubuntu Studio. You can see it here.

    http://ubuntustudio.org/

    It has lots of the packages all in one distro, it makes it nice for those that really want to jump into linux and play around with the apps you listed above. I haven’t really been a fan of Ubuntu myself, but the studio version does look pretty nice, I might try it.